After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
RELEVANT NURSING EDUCATION STANDARDS TO THE CHAPTER CONTENT
AACN Essentials Relevant Standard Domains and Concepts:Knowledge for Nursing Practice, Professionalism, Person-Centered Care, Population Health, Scholarship for the Nursing Discipline, Quality and Safety, Systems-Based Care, Interprofessional Partnerships, Informatics and Healthcare Technologies, Personal/Professional/Leadership Development Concepts:Clinical judgment, communication, compassionate care, diversity/equity/inclusion, ethics, evidence-based practice; health policy, social determinants of health (AACN, 2021)
NLN Values Related to Standards:Culture of caring, diversity and inclusion, excellence, and integrity (NLN, 2021)
Chapter Outline
This is the concluding chapter in this text, but in another sense, it is the beginning of your professional journey. Leadership is key to the success of the profession, so we end with a discussion about leadership and connect content found in this text. Content related to leadership is found throughout this text, such as in discussions about the development of the profession, nursing education, healthcare policy, legal and ethical issues, standards, healthcare organizations (HCOs), coordination and collaboration, communication, interprofessional teams, delegation, conflict resolution, evidence-based practice (EBP) and research, and the healthcare professions and nursing competencies. This discussion does not end with this text or in a course that introduces the critical elements of the nursing profession. Instead, this chapter marks a beginning because it highlights key concerns introduced elsewhere in the text, and the content focuses on the future of nursing and the need for greater leadership-both for the profession and for individual nurses. This content also explores some of the emerging issues, trends, and initiatives important to the nursing profession and the need for greater nursing leadership. More changes are predicted for the future, but most are unknown. You are the future of nursing, and all this content is relevant to you.
Leadership and Management in Nursing
Leadership is important for every nurse, whether the nurse is in a formal administrative/management position or not, during routine practice and times of change and stress. For example, we saw the need for strong nursing leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic to guide staff in practice and in nursing education, particularly in adapting over time to meet practice needs and student requirements. All settings and practice areas require that nursing leaders demonstrate leadership characteristics and competencies and ensure that the nursing profession is an active participant in the healthcare delivery system and in the development and implementation of healthcare policy. The Future of Nursing reports support this perspective by emphasizing the need for nurses to assume more leadership in health care, and to accomplish this, nurses need greater leadership competency, as noted in revisions of nursing education standards (NAM, 2021; AACN, 2021; IOM, 2011).
Leadership Models and Theories
A good place to begin to better understand nursing leadership is with an overview of leadership models and theories, critical issues, and a comparison of leadership and management. Leadership and management are not the same, although effective managers need to demonstrate leadership. In general, earlier leadership models and theories emphasized control and getting the job done with little, if any, emphasis on creativity and innovation or staff participation in decision-making. The following is a summary of some of the key models and theories to illustrate how they have changed over time.
These models and theories have long been used in health care. Some HCOs still use them or some adaptation of them. Nevertheless, these approaches are not effective in today's rapidly changing environment, where staff members want to participate more and seek recognition for their performance and expertise. However, they still expect leaders to guide the overall process. Over time, new models and theories that built on one another developed. Often, these changes began in other industries and then were adopted by HCOs. Some of these newer theories are highlighted here:
As changes were made in leadership models and theories in the last 20 years, there has been a movement toward greater staff participation, recognition of staff performance, staff and staff-manager relationships, teamwork, and collaboration. This is very different from autocratic, bureaucratic, or even laissez-faire leadership approaches.
As a result of these changes, a newer leadership theory stands out today-a theory that has connections to the theories previously described. In early Quality Chasm reports, experts recommended that the best leadership style today for healthcare delivery is transformational leadership. This approach emphasizes a positive work environment, recognition of the importance of change and using change effectively, rewarding staff for expertise and performance, and development of staff awareness of work processes so that they can engage in quality improvement (IOM, 2003a). Transformational leaders create vision and mission statements with staff to guide the work of the organization. They view change as an opportunity and are described as honest, energetic, loyal, confident, self-directed, flexible, and committed. Staff members can see these characteristics in a transformational leader and want to work for and with this leader. Some studies indicate that there is a connection between staff perceiving their nursing leaders as transformational leaders and staff perceptions of a positive work environment; there is less staff burnout and more staff engagement in this work environment and its processes (Lewis & Cunningham, 2016). This type of study further supports the need for transformational leadership and more nursing research to better understand this type of leadership.
Nursing Professional Governance: Empowering Nursing Staff
With the changing healthcare environment and changes in leadership and management models or theories, there is a greater need to focus more on team efforts as has been noted throughout this text. These changes led to the development and greater use of nursing professional governance (NPG) (shared decision-making), which can be viewed as a management philosophy, a professional practice model, and an accountability model that focuses on staff involvement in decision-making, particularly in decisions that affect their practice (Finkelman, 2024, p. 115). Through NPG, nurses in an organization can (Hess, 2004):
The term shared governance has been replaced with nursing professional governance (Raso, 2019; Porter-O'Grady & Clavelle, 2021; O'Grady, 2017). As was true for shared governance, this is an approach that focuses on engaging staff at all levels in decision-making, and the same characteristics noted above apply. Nurse managers are not the only decision-makers in this practice model, and there is now greater emphasis on self-management and control over practice, which should develop nurses who are more efficient, accountable, and feel empowered. When HCOs establish NPG, they may begin by using the Structural Professional Governance Self-Assessment Survey (SPGS - A) which addresses structural requisites needed to support and advance the behavioral attributes of professional governance: accountability, professional obligation, collateral relationships, and effective decision making (Porter-O'Grady & Clavelle, 2021, p. 195). Information gathered from this survey then guides the development and implementation of the organization's NPG.
When NPG is used, as was also true for shared governance, nurses assume an active role in the management of patient care services and thus have more control over their practice (Murray et al., 2016). This is a management model that emphasizes the need for nurses to share accountability and responsibility and typically leads to increased staff commitment to the HCO. Nurses have the authority to make sure the right decisions are made about the work they do. Accountability means that the nurse accepts responsibility for outcomes or is answerable for what is done. Responsibility means to be entrusted with a particular function (Ritter-Teitel, 2002, p. 34). These aspects of management are connected to autonomy, or the right to make decisions and control actions. The most effective approach occurs when the nurse who provides care is also the staff member who works to resolve issues and ensure that patient outcomes are achieved at the point of care, limiting the number or layers of staff who must be involved in improving care. This is more effective than someone far above the direct-care situation telling staff what they must do to improve. It is important to recognize that NPG is dependent on effective collaboration, communication, and teamwork and spreads departmental and organizational decision-making over many staff, providing opportunities for more decentralized decision-making. This approach, however, does not mean that managers can ignore their managerial and leadership responsibilities or that all decisions are made by the staff. If the process blocks decision-making-for example, by taking too long to make a decision-then this model will not be effective. This approach means that with staff inclusion managers must do their jobs differently. NPG is not easy to develop, and sometimes, it can become a barrier to the delivery of efficient, high-quality care, but it is usually helpful. It takes time to develop an effective NPG structure and culture and then maintain it, which is something that both management and staff need to recognize.
HCOs may vary in how they structure NPG, but the principles are typically the same-as described here. For example, a hospital may have a nursing council with different nursing staff represented, and the council makes certain decisions about the operation of nursing services with committees and task forces working on various aspects to ensure effective nursing care and meeting staff work needs, such as staffing, scheduling, education, salaries and benefits, promotion structure, and so on. Typically, hospitals that use an NPG model have more satisfied staff members and lower staff turnover. Staff like working in this type of organization and describe it as a positive work environment. Not all hospitals use NPG, and its implementation and effectiveness can vary widely, but many are applying it and finding it improves the organization, performance, management, and patient outcomes.
Leadership Versus Management
It is easy to confuse leadership and management. A leader can be a leader and not a manager, just as a manager can be a manager and not a leader. A leader provides overall guidance and supports staff engagement at all levels of the organization. A manager holds a formal management or administrative position and, in that position, focuses on four major management functions: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Today, effective nurse managers need to be able to collaborate, communicate, coordinate, delegate, recognize the importance of data and outcomes; manage resources (budget, staff, equipment, supplies, space, and so on); improve staff performance and patient outcomes; develop and support teams; and evaluate effectiveness and efficiency. In management positions, nurses must actively support and apply evidence-based practice (EBP), evidence-based management (EBM), and QI. Nurse managers need to use critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and judgment, and be flexible and adjust to change using the planning process. The nurse manager role has changed over time, particularly due to the changing healthcare environment and changes in leadership and management models, and there is greater emphasis on QI as a critical requirement for managers.
When someone is described as a leader, this is often due to the person's ability to influence others; however, this does not necessarily mean that the person viewed as a leader is in a formal management position. In contrast, managers have power because they hold formal management positions, such as team leader, nurse manager, department director or supervisor, or chief nursing officer. Ideally, all managers should also be leaders and viewed as leaders by their staff, but this does not always happen. Bennis and Goldsmith described one viewpoint on the difference between leaders and managers, which continues to be important to recognize (1997, p. 4): There is a profound difference-a chasm-between leaders and managers. A good manager does things right. A leader does the right thing. This view continues to be important. A problem in HCOs and in nursing is the existence of the Peter Principle, which occurs when someone is promoted beyond the leadership and management competencies required for a new position. This is a particular problem in nursing as it is not uncommon to promote a very competent clinical nurse to a management position and assume that this will lead to management success. In many cases, it does not.
Major changes in healthcare delivery have led to the need for changes in leadership and management. The following aspects of leadership continue to be important and impact management (Porter-O'Grady, 1999, p. 40):
Consideration of these factors provides greater opportunity to develop and implement transformational leadership, and an effective nurse manager should demonstrate transformational leadership.
There are many myths about leadership that are important to address, and three of them are key for nursing leaders to consider as they develop their own leadership or develop other nurses for leadership (Goffee & Jones, 2000).
HCOs need to support the development of nursing staff leadership, and nurses need to develop their own leadership. Leaders do not just happen; they need education, guidance and support, mentoring, and ongoing development.
Nursing Management Positions
Nurse managers today have much more responsibility than in the past. The main purpose of management is to get the job done effectively. There are three common levels of management. The first level includes managers who work with staff daily to complete required work. The typical title at this level is nurse manager, though HCO titles may vary. This person guides and supervises a unit's nursing staff, both professional and nonprofessional, to ensure that quality patient care is delivered at the clinical unit level. The second level in an organization consists of middle managers who supervise multiple first-level managers. Such managers might include a nursing supervisor or director who supervises all the unit nurse managers, for example, in a medical division or all the nurse managers in the ambulatory care clinics and the emergency department. Middle-level managers report to upper-level managers, such as the chief nursing officer or director. The upper level is the chief nursing officer (CNO) or nurse executive. This nurse manager is responsible for the overall work of the nursing service/department and, in some cases, may be responsible for services in addition to nursing and is considered a member of the HCO administration. Regardless of level, the manager must be able to perform management functions and demonstrate leadership.
This description is the most common structure for nursing management in HCOs, such as hospitals; however, there are variations from organization to organization. In addition, some staff may hold nonmanagerial positions, but they also need to be effective leaders and demonstrate some management functions, such as planning. These individuals do not have supervisory responsibilities because they do not always direct and evaluate staff, but they must influence staff. For example, a clinical nurse specialist (CNS), advanced practice registered nurse (APRN), clinical nurse leader (CNL), or nurse informaticist may hold this type of position.
Stop and Consider 1 |
---|
Leadership and management are part of nursing professional governance. |
Factors That Influence Leadership
Many factors influence the development of leadership competencies and the practice of effective leadership. Some of the factors are organization based, such as administrative support of effective leadership development, clear communication and processes, recognition and empowerment, application of evidence-based management (EBM), and so on. Other factors are focused more on individuals who are leaders or aspire to improve and be leaders. Examples of factors are education (academic, staff education, continuing professional education), self-esteem, ability to communicate, ability to ask for guidance, effective use of problem-solving, ability to develop and communicate a vision, ability to engage others in the work process, and so on. The following sections include a discussion of some factors that should be considered in developing leadership at organizational and individual staff levels.
Generational Issues in Nursing: Impact on Image
Generational issues are important in describing the nursing profession and its image and have an impact on the nursing practice and management and, consequently, on leadership and teamwork (Moore et al., 2016). When a person thinks of a nurse, which generation or age groups are considered? Most people probably do not realize that there is not one age group but rather several represented in nursing. Today, nursing staff includes representation from multiple generations: baby boomers (born 1946-1964), Gen X/latch key (born 1965-1976), Gen Y/millennials (born 1977-1991), Gen Z/iGeneration (born 1992-present). The so-called traditional generation is no longer in practice, but this generation had a significant impact on the nursing profession and current practice (DiBlasi-Moorehead & Calawerts, 2020).
Nurses in these generations are different from one another. How does this affect the image of nursing? It means that nursing includes multiple age groups with different historical backgrounds and viewpoints. How nurses from each generation view nursing can be quite different. Their educational backgrounds vary a great deal, from nurses who entered nursing through diploma programs to nurses who entered through baccalaureate programs, and then may have completed graduate degrees. Some of these nurses have seen great changes in health care, and others see the current status as the way it has always been. Technology, for example, is frequently taken for granted by some nurses who have always been involved in technology, whereas others are overwhelmed with technological advances, which is something they did not have earlier in their personal lives. Some nurses have seen great changes in the roles of nurses, whereas other nurses now take the roles for granted-for example, the APRN role. If one asked a nurse in each generation for the nurse's view of nursing, the answers might be quite different in how nurses practice, settings in which nurses practice, management responsibilities, and so on. If these nurses then tried to explain their views to the public, the perception of nursing would most likely consist of multiple images.
The situation of multiple generations in one profession provides opportunities to enhance the profession through the diversity in their ages and their experiences, but it has also caused problems in the workplace when they may have different views of work and the profession. What are the characteristics of the various groups? How well do they mesh with the healthcare environment? How well do they work together? The following list summarizes some of the characteristics of each generation, including the traditional generation and its impact (Finkelman, 2024; DiBlasi-Moorehead & Calawerts, 2020; Moore et al., 2016):
In a profession that includes representatives from multiple generations, it is necessary to recognize that age diversity means variations in positive and negative characteristics among staff. Some will pull the profession backward if allowed, and some will push the profession forward. In the workplace, differing work ethics, communication preferences, manners, and attitudes toward authority are key areas of conflict (Siela, 2006, p. 47). This also has an impact on the nursing profession's image. As discussed here, nursing is not a profession that encompasses just one type of person or one age group, and people in different age groups are now entering nursing. We are long past the time when mostly 18-year-olds enter nursing education programs. As one generation moves toward retirement, the next generation will undoubtedly have a greater impact on the image of nursing. It is critical to avoid gender role stereotyping, and there is need to increase the strength of nurses as one group of professionals, while still recognizing that these differences exist and appreciating how they might affect the profession.
Power and Empowerment
Power and empowerment are connected to the image of nursing and the ability to assume leadership. How one is viewed can affect whether the person is considered to have power-the ability to influence, say what the profession is or is not, and influence decision-making. It is important to view power from both positive and negative perspectives. We know it can act as a barrier to success as a healthcare profession and affects teamwork, as discussed in other chapters, but how do power, powerlessness, and empowerment relate to nursing? They are critical elements influencing leadership and practice.
To feel as if no one is listening to you or you are not viewed positively can make a person feel powerless; this remains a long-standing problem for nurses. Many nurses believe that they cannot make an impact in clinical settings; management does not listen to them or seek their opinions. This powerlessness can result in nurses feeling like victims. The result may be resentment that is expressed as incivility, as discussed in other chapters in this text. The feeling of powerlessness can act against nurses when they do not actively address issues such as a negative image of nurses and when they allow others to describe what a nurse is or make decisions for nurses. This failure to be proactive merely worsens their image and diminishes professional self-esteem; both reduce leadership.
What nurses want and need is power-to be able to influence decisions and have an impact on issues that matter. Power can be used constructively or destructively, but the concern here with the nursing profession is using power constructively. Power and influence are related. Power is about gaining control to reach a goal. There is more than one type of power: informational, referent, expert, coercive, reward, and persuasive. The type of power a person possesses has an impact on how power can be used to reach goals or outcomes.
Empowerment is also an important issue for nurses today and is connected to leadership. Leaders who empower staff enable staff to act-a critical need in the nursing profession. Nursing professional governance emphasizes empowerment. Basically, empowerment is more than just saying you can participate in decision-making; staff need more than words. Empowerment is needed in day-to-day practice as nurses meet the needs of patients in hospitals, the community, and home settings. Empowerment also implies that some individuals may lose their power while others gain power. This can lead to conflict, which needs to be resolved so that it does not negatively affect the work environment and patient care.
Staff members who experience empowerment feel that they are respected and trusted to be active participants. This also helps them demonstrate a positive image to other healthcare team members, patients and their families, and the public. Nurses who do not feel empowered will not be effective in conveying a positive image because they will not be able to communicate that nurses are professionals with much to offer. Empowerment that is not clear to staff or not supported by management is just as problematic as a lack of staff empowerment. Empowered teams feel a responsibility for the team's performance and activities, which in turn can improve care and reduce errors.
Control over the nursing profession is a critical issue that is also related to the profession's image. Who should control the nursing profession, and who does? This is related to independence and autonomy-key characteristics of any profession. But an important question persists: What should be the image of nursing? As a profession, nursing does not appear to have a consensus about its image. This topic is discussed in other chapters, and here it is mentioned again as one considers nursing leadership and what nurses need to do to become more effective leaders in a complex healthcare delivery system. Nursing needs to control the image and visibility of the profession, and in doing so, if nurses have a more realistic image of themselves, they may exert more control over the solutions for the following four issues:
Assertiveness
Earlier content in this text discussed assertiveness from the point of view of teams, but here we focus on nursing assertiveness and leadership. Assertiveness is demonstrated in a person's communication, which should be direct and open with appropriate respect for others. When a person communicates in an assertive manner, verbal and nonverbal communications are congruent, making the message clearer. Assertive persons are better able to confront problems in a constructive manner and do not remain silent. Problems with the nursing profession's image have been influenced by nursing's silence caused by the inability to be assertive, but assertiveness is a critical leadership competency. Katz identified other examples of assertive behavior (2009, p. 267):
This information provides a guide to improve and maintain effective assertiveness.
Advocacy in Leadership
Advocacy is speaking on behalf of something important, and it is one of the major nursing roles. Other content discussed advocacy for patients, but now we turn to advocacy as applied to the nursing profession and the need for nursing leaders to advocate for staff. All nurses represent nursing-acting as advocates in their daily work and in their personal lives (ANA, 2023a). When someone asks a nurse, What kind of work do you do? the nurse's response is a form of advocacy for the profession. The goal is to provide a positive, informative, and accurate response.
Stop and Consider 2 |
---|
Power and empowerment should be part of the image of nursing. |
Scope of Practice: A Profession of Multiple Settings, Positions, and Specialties
Healthcare delivery requires nurses with multiple competencies and specialties to fulfill different roles in a variety of healthcare settings. Healthcare delivery is never static. For example, there is greater interest today in public/community health and, thus, an increased need for nurses to enter this healthcare area and hold a variety of positions. The following discussion considers some of the issues related to the variety of healthcare delivery settings and roles, some of which have been introduced in other chapters, but here the focus is on nursing leadership implications.
Along with understanding the nursing profession and workforce issues, certain U.S. demographics are important. In 2030, the baby boomer generation will be over 65, and it is projected that older people will outnumber children for the first time in U.S. history (U.S. Census Bureau, 2022). We do not yet know the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to the deaths of many older adults. There, however, will be changes in this patient population-leading to more patients with serious and chronic illnesses. A recent report addressed the need to prepare the healthcare workforce for these changes and provides examples of recommended strategies (NAM, 2020):
Multiple Settings and Positions
The practice of nursing takes place in multiple settings, thus offering multiple job possibilities over a nurse's career span. Many nurses change their settings, positions, and specialties based on their interests and the jobs that they want to pursue during their careers. Some examples of these nursing settings and positions are provided here, and some are discussed in other chapters.
It is unknown what the future holds for new healthcare settings or new roles, but nursing history demonstrates that the likelihood of new roles emerging is high. In an interview Porter-O'Grady, a nursing leader and expert in professional issues, commented that mobility and portability would become very important in techno therapeutic interventions, and this has now occurred (Saver, 2006). Technology is extending into patients' lives, and the settings in which care is received are less directly connected to hospitals. Others suggested that as patients demanded more control as consumers, more self-diagnostic tests would be developed (Saver, 2006). This has also occurred; for example, there are apps to monitor and identify medical problems or monitor diet or exercise, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been greater use of home testing for the virus. New roles for nurses, in turn, have emerged to support changes, such as more active roles in positions concerned with healthcare quality, in pharmaceutical companies, as nurse practitioners in clinics, managing research and development departments associated with equipment or biomedical companies, working in or leading medical homes, support and development of HIT, and in counseling. Change continues, with more expected in the future, and it will require greater nursing leadership competency.
Nursing Specialties
Nursing specialties are part of the profession and expand professionalism. There are numerous general nursing specialties, such as maternal-child (obstetrics)/women's health, nurse-midwifery, neonatal, pediatrics, emergency, critical care, ambulatory care, public/community health, home health care, hospice, surgical/perioperative, anesthesia, psychiatric/mental health/behavioral health, management, legal nurse consulting, and many more. There are also subspecialties, such as diabetic care, wound care, and renal dialysis. The most important reason specialties develop is to meet the need for focused practice experience and ensure that nurses receive the necessary education to provide specialized nursing. All specialty nursing is based on the core general nursing knowledge and competencies. The same specialty might be offered in multiple settings-for example, a certified nurse-midwife (CNM) might work in hospitals in labor and delivery, a private practice with obstetricians, clinics, freestanding delivery centers, patients' homes, or an APRN private practice providing nurse-midwifery services.
There are two ways to view a specialty. One view is based on a nurse who works in a specialty area and claims it as his or her specialty (for example, the nurse works in a mental health unit and is then considered a psychiatric/mental health nurse). A second view, combined with the first, is that the nurse has additional education and possibly certification in a specialty. For example, the psychiatric/mental health nurse may have a master's degree in psychiatric-mental health nursing and is also certified in this specialty. The key to effective functioning as a specialty nurse is making a commitment to gain additional education in the specialty. This also includes continuing professional education and may include certification.
As discussed in other content in this text, there are many titles in nursing, but they do not necessarily indicate a nurse's specialty. These titles are APRN, clinical nurse specialist (CNS), clinical nurse leader (CNL), and doctor of nursing practice (DNP) (titles and education discussed in other content in this text). The titles for CNM and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNA) make their specialties clear in their titles (midwifery and anesthesia, respectively). An APRN may focus on one or more specialties, such as families, pediatric acute care, adult-gerontology primary care or acute care, pediatric primary care, neonatal care, and psychiatric-mental health. A CNL does not typically focus on a specific clinical group in the CNL degree program; instead, this is a functional role that may be used in any type of specialty area. For example, a CNL may hold a position in a medical unit, a pediatric unit, or a women's health unit. The CNS title is also a broader term, but the CNS master's degree focuses on a specific clinical area. However, it is not a common title today due to the increased use of APRNs and CNLs. Specialty education at the graduate level and certification support professionalism in nursing and help to ensure that nursing remains a profession. As discussed in education content, many of these positions are transitioning to requiring an entry-level DNP degree rather than a master's degree. In this chapter, which is focused on leadership and the future of the profession, all these roles are important.
Nurse leaders must continually support staff and the need for professionalism within the work setting. They do this by recognizing education and degrees through differentiated practice, encouraging ongoing staff education (continuing professional education and pursuit of additional academic degrees), ensuring that standards are maintained, working to increase staff participation in decision-making, helping staff who want to move into a management position accomplish this goal (for example, by directing staff to management-focused education to prepare for the role), and mentoring staff who want to pursue the management track. Nurse leaders also need to encourage staff to participate in professional organizations, publish in professional journals, attend professional conferences, submit abstracts for presentations, participate in EBP, QI, and research, and recognize staff accomplishments throughout the HCO.
Advanced Practice Registered Nurse: Changing Scope of Practice
The role of the APRN has expanded over time. For example, early in the development of this role, a review of research studies on APRNs indicated that [n]urses' role in primary care has recently received substantial scrutiny, as demand for primary care has increased and nurse practitioners have gained traction with the public. Evidence from many studies indicates that primary care services, such as wellness and prevention services, diagnosis and management of many common uncomplicated acute illnesses, and management of chronic diseases, such as diabetes, can be provided by nurse practitioners at least as safely and effectively as by physicians (Fairman et al., 2010, p. 280). The report The Future of Nursing also recommended increased expansion of nurses' scope of practice in primary care focused on advanced practice (IOM, 2011). Changes have occurred, but today one of the critical factors that limits nurse practitioners' scope of practice is state-based regulations (NCSBN, 2023a). Some approved legislation has had an impact on APRN scope of practice. One example is the movement to allow APRNs to sign home health plans of care and certify Medicare patients for home health benefits. These changes required legislation. President Trump signed the Home Health Care Planning Improvement Act of 2019 into law. This legislation, which is federal, impacts APRNs wherever they may practice with Medicare patients. This change improves the transition of care for patients by providing another option that supports timely and effective planning for patients (Donlan, 2020). Direct payment for nurse practitioners has been a long-term issue, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) now allows payment; however, there are other payers that may not provide this reimbursement.
As noted previously, there are several barriers that have prevented expansion of the role of nurse practitioners in primary care, particularly state laws that limit scope of practice and reimbursement policies. Some of these issues and actions taken to try and increase APRN scope of practice and reimbursement have increased professional tensions among nurse practitioners, physicians, and physician assistants. The CMS expansion of home healthcare actions by APRNs is an example of how policy solutions can address several issues that have long been barriers for APRNs by (1) removing unwarranted restrictions on scope of practice, (2) equalizing payment and recognizing nurse practitioners as eligible providers, (3) increasing nurses' accountability, (4) expanding nurse-managed centers, (5) addressing professional tensions and focus more on interprofessional teams, (6) funding education for the primary care workforce, and (7) funding research to examine outcomes (Naylor & Kurtzman, 2010, p. 898). It will take time to assess the outcomes of the CMS changes and determine if more changes are needed. All of this requires nursing leadership and advocacy to ensure that health policy considers what nurses may offer to patients and to healthcare delivery.
Stop and Consider 3 |
---|
There are new nursing positions for APRNs but also for all nurses. |
Professional Practice
Today, professional practice models are viewed as having an impact both on the nursing profession and on quality care and provide a view of professional nursing for a group or an HCO-it may be a verbal description, visual, or both. A professional practice model depicts nursing values and defines the structures and processes that support nurses to control their own practice and to deliver quality care. A professional practice model provides the foundations for quality nursing practice (Slatyer et al., 2016, p. 139). Some HCOs are developing, or have developed, their own professional practice models, but all should include a description of its mission, vision, and values; how the organization manages and governs; how the organization cares for its patients; how various professions relate to one another; and how the organization develops and recognizes employees (Robert & Finlayson, 2015, p. 26). Elements of a successful professional practice model should support expected nursing profession standards, differentiated practice, shared professional governance, collaboration, leadership, EBP and EBM, teams, and ongoing staff education. These elements are important topics and discussed in this text.
Differentiated Nursing Practice
Differentiated nursing practice is a factor in developing a professional practice model. The subject of the preferred degree for entry into nursing practice continues to be an issue in the nursing profession. As discussed in content on education, a decision was made in 1965 to establish the baccalaureate in nursing (BSN) as the nursing entry-level degree. Although this has yet to be fully implemented, it has increased. The emphasis on the BSN degree by some hospitals as part of the Magnet Recognition Program® has made a difference. Having an all-BSN staff is not required but rather encouraged that these hospitals support this level of education. Consequently, these HCOs usually have more registered nurses (RNs) with BSN degrees. Many studies and papers (Boston-Fleischhauer, 2019; Harrison et al., 2019; Kutney-Lee et al., 2016; Blegen et al., 2013; McHugh et al., 2013; Aiken et al., 2008; Friese et al., 2015) indicate that there is a positive impact on patient care when more RNs have a BSN degree, and this type of research result influenced this change. We are seeing more students in BSN programs and more nurses returning to complete a BSN degree.
Graduates from all types of nursing programs take the same licensure exam, and this complicates the differentiated practice issue. RN licensure is the same for all nursing graduates regardless of the type of degree earned. This is not a new topic-in 1990, Boston defined differentiated nursing practice as a philosophy that focuses on the structuring of roles and functions of nurses according to education, experience, and competence (p. 1). This does not mean that a graduate from one program is necessarily better than another because many individual factors determine effectiveness and competence; rather, it indicates that graduates from each program enter practice having completed a curriculum associated with a level of education and related competencies. Having a BSN degree may impact job opportunities. A 2022 AACN survey of 646 schools of nursing found that 27.7% of hospitals and other healthcare settings require new hires to have a bachelor's degree in nursing (BSN). Additionally, 71.7% of employers are expressing a strong preference for BSN program graduates (AACN, 2023a).
Differentiated practice continues to be an issue in the profession, and it needs to be addressed more in nursing policies and application to professional practice models, which may identify required levels of education and competency. With AACN research identifying a correlation between BSN-educated nurses and improved patient outcomes, this supports its efforts to encourage employers to foster practice environments that embrace lifelong learning and offer incentives for registered nurses (RNs) seeking to advance their education to the baccalaureate and higher degree levels. We also encourage BSN graduates to seek out employers who value their level of education and distinct competencies (AACN, 2022a). Many employers do not formally recognize a nurse's degree, for example, it is rarely noted on employee identification badges, and if noted, the degree designation is difficult to read on small name badges. Patients and many other staff do not know about nursing degrees and roles-they group all nurses together into the RN group. Another issue is that salaries are often not based on a nurse's education level unless it is a graduate degree, although they should be. Much needs to be done by the profession to address this area of concern, and this requires professional leadership.
Examples of Professional Practice Models
Why does an HCO need a professional practice model for nursing? When the Magnet Recognition Program® was developed, the description of the Magnet forces and the Magnet model provided the rationale for this program as: Conceptual models provide an infrastructure that decreases variation among nurses, the interventions they will choose, and, ultimately, patient outcomes. Conceptual frameworks also differentiate forward thinking organizations from those where nursing has less of a voice (Kerfoot et al., 2006, p. 20). These forward-thinking HCOs also tended to have a professional rather than technical view of nursing with nursing leadership recognizing this view. A model offers nurses a consistent way of framing the care they deliver to patients and their families (Kerfoot et al., 2006, p. 21). The Forces of Magnetism for Magnet hospitals now emphasize the need for HCOs to implement a professional practice model. The Magnet Recognition Program®, which is a nursing practice model, is discussed later in this chapter.
Examples of professional practice models are found in Figures 14-1, 14-2, 14-3, 14-4, 14-5, and 14-6. Some of these models are no longer used, but it is important to understand their evolution; sometimes, they are used again or revised. The functional model is used less today, although the total care model may be used in critical care. The primary care nursing model was very popular in the 1980s but less so now because it requires a greater number of RNs. Some HCOs, however, still use this model, but usually as an adaptation of the original model.
Figure 14-1 Nursing leadership.
A word cloud highlights terms related to nurse leadership. Prominent terms include nurse leadership, vision, goal, business, lead, team, management, success, strategy, career, teamwork, chief, and communication.
© Sharaf Maksumov/shutterstock
Figure 14-2 Team nursing model.
A hierarchical structure of the team nursing model outlines roles and relationships.
The Charge nurse directs three team leaders, each of whom manages a group of nursing staff. Arrows indicate the flow of responsibilities from the Charge nurse to team leaders, then from team leaders to nursing staff, and finally from nursing staff to patients endash clients. Each role is visually represented by an icon.
Hansten, R. I., & Jackson, M. (2011). Clinical delegation skills: A handbook for professional practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Figure 14-3 Functional nursing model.
A hierarchical structure of the functional nursing model outlines roles and responsibilities.
The Charge nurse directs tasks to the R N medication nurse, R N treatment nurse, nursing assistants for hygienic care, and clerical housekeeping. Arrows indicate the flow of responsibilities from the Charge nurse to these roles and then to patients endash clients. Each role is visually represented by an icon.
Hansten, R. I., & Jackson, M. (2011). Clinical delegation skills: A handbook for professional practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Figure 14-4 Total patient care model.
A hierarchical structure of the total care nursing model outlines roles and responsibilities.
The Charge nurse directs three groups of nursing staff, each group taking care of their assigned patients endash clients. Arrows indicate the flow of responsibilities from the Charge nurse to each group of nursing staff, and then from each group of nursing staff to their respective patients endash clients. Each role is visually represented by an icon.
Hansten, R. I., & Jackson, M. (2011). Clinical delegation skills: A handbook for professional practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Figure 14-5 Primary care model.
A hierarchical structure of the primary nursing model outlines roles and responsibilities.
The primary nurse and patient endash client with bidirectional arrows are depicted at the center. Surrounding them are the physician, charge nurse, and hospital resources, all connected with bidirectional arrows to the primary nurse. Below are associate nurses for evenings, nights, and as needed at nights, all connected with arrows to the primary nurse. Each role is visually represented by an icon.
Hansten, R. I., & Jackson, M. (2011). Clinical delegation skills: A handbook for professional practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Figure 14-6 Case management model.
A hierarchical structure of the case management model outlines roles and responsibilities.
At the left is the nurse manager, who directs the case manager. The case manager oversees a multidisciplinary team, L P N, associate personnel, and R N. Arrows indicate the flow of responsibilities from the case manager to these roles, and then from these roles to the patient. Each role is visually represented by an icon.
Hansten, R. I., & Jackson, M. (2011). Clinical delegation skills: A handbook for professional practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses' Synergy Model for Patient Care is another example of a current nursing model. This model's core premise is closely related to the healthcare professions and nursing competencies, particularly PCC, as it focuses on patient and family needs as the drivers of the nurse's characteristics and competencies (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 2023). The model identifies key patient characteristics as resiliency, vulnerability, stability, complexity, resource availability, participation in care, participation in decision, and predictability, and the key nurse competencies are clinical judgment, advocacy, caring practices, collaboration, systems thinking, response to diversity, clinical inquiry, facilitation of learning, and clinical inquiry (innovator/evaluator) (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 2023; Harden & Kaplow, 2016). This model can be applied to all types of units, not just critical care.
Innovative and newer professional practice models have common elements (Kimball et al., 2007). Specifically, they include an elevated RN role; greater focus on the patient; efforts to improve patient transition and handoff to decrease errors and make the patient more comfortable; leveraging of technology to enable a care model design, such as EMRs, robots, barcoding, cell phone communication, and more; and greater emphasis on results or outcomes. The healthcare professions and nursing competencies also provide an effective start for a professional practice model (IOM, 2003b).
Stop and Consider 4 |
---|
Differentiated practice has an impact on every nurse. |
Impact of Legislation/Regulation/Policy on Nursing Leadership and Practice
Effective healthcare legislation, regulations, and policies should include nurses who work collaboratively with stakeholders in shaping health policy through legislation and regulation. Nurses are involved and will continue to be involved at the local, state, national, and international levels as noted in previous content.
An example of the need for nursing profession involvement is policies that are related to nursing staffing. Over the last decade, many agencies, through the establishment of state workforce centers, have examined the impact of state legislation and regulation on nursing supply and demand. State workforce centers focus on maintaining an adequate supply of qualified nurses within a state to meet healthcare needs (demand), providing analysis and strategies to address unmet needs (National Forum of State Nursing Workforce Centers, 2023). This initiative has been more successful on the state level than the federal/national level, though we need both perspectives to better prepare to meet staffing needs for all healthcare professionals. The National Health Care Workforce Centers initiative is designed to focus on the future needs of the workforce, using data collection and analysis to better understand the problem and develop strategies to resolve problems, such as the impact on nursing education planning. Most states have a state-focused workforce initiative.
In addition, COVID-19 has made it very clear that staffing issues during a crisis of this magnitude have a major impact on the public's health and require a national perspective (HHS, CDC, 2021). It is not yet clear what the long-term impact of our experiences with COVID-19 will be on staffing (NCSBN, 2020). In a December 7, 2020, statement the National Council for State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) identified concerns about workforce issues and COVID-19 care and associated its views with those of multiple nursing organizations (2020) and with federal government concerns and initiatives:
There is no doubt that quality care is a major issue addressed by healthcare legislation. Nurses need to be involved in these initiatives because they directly affect patient care every day in multiple settings, and they have important expertise to share. Healthcare legislation at the state level is also important to nursing. For example, many states have tried to pass legislation related to mandatory overtime and staff-patient ratios-and some states have already enacted this type of law. The use of required mandatory overtime was also an issue during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Congressional Nurses' Caucus is responsible for educating the U.S. Congress about nursing (AONL, 2023). It is important that state and federal legislators understand the nursing profession and its importance to health and healthcare delivery in the United States. There are approximately 100 nurses who serve in the U.S. Congress and in state legislatures. More nurses are needed to run for office at the local, state, and national levels. Nurses who have an interest in politics and health policy need to plan for this activity, particularly if they want to run for office in the future. This requires a career plan with a time frame, mentoring, and experience in political activities.
Regulation is also an important issue today as change occurs both within the healthcare system and within nursing, impacting policies as discussed in earlier content. One example is an initiative to change regulations related to APRNs, focusing on changes to allow APRNs to practice independently of physicians, when appropriate. Many states are examining such changes, and some are enacting them.
Stop and Consider 5 |
---|
To improve health care, we need more nursing leadership in health policy. |
Economic Value and the Nursing Profession
Salaries and benefits, which vary across the United States, have long been a concern of nurses. Some nurses have unionized to get better salaries and benefits and to have more say in the decision-making process in the work setting. The nursing profession has yet to develop effective methods to determine their value in the reimbursement process and implications for HCO budgets, and it is important to solve this problem. How do nurses describe the value of nursing services? How do nurses identify the costs of nursing services? Some efforts have been made to accomplish this, but there is much more to do. Within the fragmented healthcare system, nursing contributions are even more difficult to identify. Most HCO accounting systems have not been able to capture or differentiate the economic value provided by nurses (IOM, 2010).
APRNs have brought the issue of payment for nursing services to the forefront. The Federal Employee Compensation Act-a law that covers healthcare services for federal employees who are injured on the job-has become important to APRNs. Though it took some time to change, APRNs are now covered medical providers for Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE (military fee-for-service health plan), and some private insurance plans, and they serve as medical providers in the Veterans Administration, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the Indian Health Service. If they choose, most federal employees can have access to APRNs through their federal employee health benefit plan.
Because greater emphasis has been placed on healthcare quality, there has been an expansion in focusing on a pay-for-performance model (PFP)-third-party payers and the government determine payment for services based on performance or quality care (NEJM Catalyst, 2018). This change is exemplified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) and other insurers' refusal to pay for certain complications/conditions experienced by patients (hospital-acquired conditions [HACs]) and for 30-day postdischarge unplanned readmissions, as discussed in QI content. In turn, this policy has an impact on nursing care and on budgetary decisions related to nursing. Because nurses are involved in most of the care associated with HACs and with discharge planning, nurses have an opportunity to exhibit leadership in these areas and demonstrate that they can have a major impact on the quality of care and cost of care by developing effective interventions to assess risk and prevent these HACs and prepare for more effective discharge transition.
Stop and Consider 6 |
---|
We do not have consistent and effective recognition of the economic value of nursing practice. |
The Nursing Work Environment
The nursing work environment is critical for quality care, patient satisfaction, staff satisfaction, staff recruitment and retention, HCO financial stability (for example, if an HCO has high staff turnover, the HCO will have higher expenses associated with recruitment and orientation), development of leadership and effective management, and effective use of interprofessional teams. Key findings from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (NSSRN) administered by the HRSA noted the following (HHS, HRSA, 2023b):
This type of data changes over time so the routine collection of data through the HRSA survey is useful information for the profession, and the data are reported some time after being collected. Many factors impact the data, such as the unexpected experience of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting changes in U.S. economic status. This section discusses some current issues relevant to healthy work environments. The American Organization for Nursing Leadership (AONL), along with Johnson & Johnson, conducted an online survey of nurses to better understand the current state of the profession during the time of the pandemic. The respondents included other health professions, but of the total of 4,000 respondents, 1,000 were nurses (inclusive of 236 APRNs) and 250 nursing students, with the study indicating that even during the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been some improvement (AONL, 2021):
Sixty four percent of nurses who spent more than half their time with COVID-19 patients were satisfied with collaborative interprofessional team opportunities, compared with 57% of nurses who spent less than half their time with COVID-19 patients. Among the same sample of nurses working with COVID-19 patients the following were noted:
The Work Environment and Leadership
Quality care is best provided in a healthy, functional work environment. Key issues are staff safety; communication; collaborative, positive work relationships; work design (space/facility); work processes; infrastructure that support staff participation in decision-making; and an emphasis on positive work environments that support staff, reduce staff stress/burnout and high turnover rates, and develop staff. This requires an environment in which staff members respect one another and incivility is controlled, as discussed in other content in this text. Nurse managers need to develop and maintain a work environment that engages staff in work processes, decision-making, and quality improvement. Job resources, interpersonal relationships, job performance, and proactive work behavior are factors that influence the status of the work environment. There are many factors that impact burnout and staff turnover today, such as the need for more time, resources, staff, and energy to get the work done, while often working within poorly designed systems. Joy at work is an important issue for individual staff and for organizations. It impacts individual staff engagement and satisfaction, the patient experience, quality of care, patient safety, and organizational performance. Four steps may be used by nurse managers/leaders to improve joy in work (IHI, 2017, p. 5):
A safety climate is important for ensuring positive patient outcomes, but HCOs cannot ignore the critical importance of nursing leadership-strong leaders who know how to guide staff in the complex system and examine the situation for improvements (Farag et al., 2017). We need to know more about staff fatigue, trust in the HCO, and work overload to better ensure safe and healthy working climates.
The Future of Nursing report highlighted the unique needs of new graduates and recommended nurse residency programs as a means to increase retention of staff, guide transition into the workplace, and improve the quality of care (IOM, 2011). This report focused much of its content on APRNs; however, most nurses are not APRNs but rather staff nurses with complex staff needs, and they work in a complex environment. If these needs are not addressed, this omission has a major negative impact on patient care-more significantly, it affects quality as well as nursing practice.
Workforce Issues and Effective Staffing
There are just over 5 million active RNs in the United States spread out over many different healthcare settings and providing a variety of nursing services (NCSBN, 2023b). Nurse staffing supply and demand are influenced by such factors as population growth, the aging of the nation's population, overall economic conditions, expanded health insurance coverage, changes in health care reimbursement, geographic location, and health workforce availability (HHS, HRSA, 2017, p. 7). The demand for baccalaureate-prepared nurses has increased annually in addition to the demand for advanced practice and doctoral-prepared nurses. It is not yet clear the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on supply and demand in the future-or even in the near future. This has been discussed in this text, and in summary, many factors impact these projections, for example, the changes in the healthcare system required by the pandemic and post-pandemic, morbidity and mortality due to the pandemic, staff trust in the system, the national economy, and the pipeline of students entering nursing academic programs and availability of qualified faculty. Funding will also be a critical factor impacting the operation of nursing education programs and for continued availability of student scholarships and loans. An example of expanding staffing needs and methods to resolve some of these concerns is the push in early 2021 from the National Nurse Corps: The purpose of the Nurse Corps Loan Repayment Program (Nurse Corps LRP) is to provide loan repayment assistance to registered nurses (RNs), including advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), in return for a commitment to work at eligible health care facilities with a critical shortage of nurses or serve as nurse faculty in eligible schools of nursing (HHS, HRSA, 2023c).
In all types of healthcare settings, staffing methods and number of staff have an impact on staff morale, staff retention, the budget, and quality care. Staffing is also an empowerment issue-scheduling affects staff directly and their ability to engage in decision-making. Fairness in patient assignments and staff scheduling is an important factor in ensuring a positive work environment and manager-staff relationships (Cathro, 2013). The fact that staffing needs are not static, even changing throughout the day, makes this a very complex workforce issue, as noted in the following discussion, and requires managers who are aware of changing needs and respect the staff, encouraging their participation.
When examining workforce issues and staffing, it is important to examine nurses' perceived job preparedness across different demographic and professional characteristics. This was examined in a recent study using a national sample of practicing nurses (Zahnd et al., 2020). Results indicated that nurses in rural areas and male nurses felt less prepared. Nurses who had practiced longer were more likely to feel better prepared, but the type of nursing degree a nurse had did not necessarily influence confidence in the nurse's preparation and practice. This study has limitations, such as the rate of return of the survey and the use of a homogeneous sample. More research is needed to further examine this important issue. Learning more about it may help to develop strategies to assist nurses in feeling more prepared.
When staffing is considered, it requires a review of many issues, such as patient acuity and changes in status; staff expertise; staff mix; use of delegation; supervision; budget; staff fatigue and stress; staff behaviors that may be negative, such as incivility; a physical environment conducive to work needs; number and type of admissions and discharges; the presence of students (any type of healthcare profession student); presence and quality of medical staff; access to resources, such as pharmacist consultation; timely and effective patient transport methods; use of electronic documentation; clear position descriptions; application of acceptable standards; clear and accessible policies and procedures; access to EBP resources; the impact of the presence of family members or significant others; leadership within the HCO; budget; staff orientation and education; and more. These factors demonstrate that staffing is more than just the number of staff and requires careful analysis and planning. There is increased interest from nursing leadership to better address these factors in the workplace. An example is staff fatigue from long hours and shift work. The American Academy of Nursing (the Academy) supports efforts to reduce fatigue in nurses through education, workplace policies and management systems, and fatigue countermeasures. The Academy recommends that healthcare services and standard-setting organizations establish policies to address this pervasive workplace hazard, thereby promoting nurses' health and safety along with patient and public safety (Caruso et al., 2019). This continues to be recognized as an important problem (Brown et al., 2020):
A topic that has long caused concern for the nursing profession is potential and actual nursing shortages (AACN, 2022b). There have been periods when there were national shortages and regional shortages. In addition, individual HCOs may experience shortages, which may be due to budget cuts, recruitment problems, and poor HCO ratings, thus reducing applications for positions and/or leading to staff retention problems. Future nursing shortages are expected as more nurses retire due to the number of nurses approaching retirement age. This is coupled with a growing need for more nurses due to patient care expansion. The healthcare delivery system had to cope with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and how it has affected current staff and those who might be considering nursing as a career. It is difficult to predict staffing levels that will be needed to provide required care, but it is important that we understand this more and improve. For example, more information is coming out indicating that some people who have had COVID-19 are experiencing long-term health problems that may become chronic. What will this mean for services needed, staffing, a better understanding of these problems and interventions (healthcare profession education, research, EBP), and so on? We also need more nurses who are competent and interested in caring for the growing aging population. This requires both pertinent clinical content and experiences with this population in nursing programs (prelicensure and graduate levels) and staff education to increase staff competencies in this area. It is also likely that communities will develop more services for older adults and need nurses to develop and manage these services and provide clinical care. As staffing is examined, there is a need to identify changes in health and health services as demonstrated in these examples. Each is different and requires different staff competencies and levels.
Staffing and related workforce issues are also directly related to nursing education. To meet demands, there must be sufficient graduates from nursing programs, which means there must be sufficiently qualified applicants in nursing program admission pools. A shortage of nursing faculty has, in some cases, led to nursing programs turning away qualified students, as discussed in other chapters. Efforts have been made to provide funding for graduate education to increase the faculty pool.
The work environment is an important factor in recruiting and retaining nurses. This environment is high stress; however, some HCOs have more problems than others leading to staff dissatisfaction, burnout, turnover, and a decrease in productivity. All of this may lead to a reputation of a poor place to work, driving employee applicants away, and may even lead to staff retention problems. HCOs need to continually assess these issues and institute changes to reduce stress in the workplace, and staffing is one of these factors. Ensuring adequate staffing levels has been shown to (ANA, 2014):
HCOs need to commit to developing and maintaining a culture of safety, and this must include staff safety issues. The level of staffing impacts staff safety-for example, if there are too few staff, this may lead to more staff stress and staff injuries from lifting patients when staff do not consider the most effective interventions and/or ask for help. Another example that has become more common due to the pandemic is the need to use personal protective equipment (PPE)-staff need to have access to PPE; use it effectively; cope with the stress of using it, such as temperature, comfort, lack of vision during person-to-person interactions that are blocked by masks; and so on. In addition, caring for patients for whom outcomes may result in increased patient morbidity and mortality is difficult for staff who must also cope with increased staff workload, stress, and their own health risks and even that of their families if staff contract the virus.
An example of a method that some hospitals use to provide more flexible staffing is referred to as floating. This occurs when some staff members are moved from unit to unit or work area to provide temporary staffing coverage. In some cases, the float staff do this as needed, and in other cases, a hospital may have permanent float staff, meaning they always move from unit to unit when needed. Either way, doing this type of work requires competent staff with confidence that they can work in different areas. They should receive a general orientation about floating and need to be given a brief orientation when they move to a new unit. In most hospitals, these staff members become familiar with the units so that it is not a completely new experience when they change units. Another concern is how regular staff members work with float staff who are helping them out in a time of need. Float staff need to feel comfortable asking for help to reduce errors and ensure patient care consistency. In a study that examined nurses' perceptions of floating, some of the concerns from the sample of nurses were too much time spent trying to get information, having a buddy assigned for questions was helpful, the importance of the charge nurse providing support and asking routinely if they needed help, and providing an orientation to nurses who will float (Hoffman & Sadovszky, 2019).
Appendix Bprovides some guidelines about staffing that are important for students to review to better understand staffing and scheduling. The guidelines also provide information that should be considered when searching for your first nursing positions. Staffing is an important topic in job interviews, and applicants need to be prepared with questions addressing this topic.
Interprofessional Teams and the Work Environment
Interprofessional teams are critical in today's healthcare workplace, as discussed throughout this text. One of the healthcare professions' competencies and nursing competencies, as noted in this text, is the ability to use interprofessional teams effectively as teams have a major impact on the work environment. This requires the use of effective approaches to prepare nursing students and other healthcare professions students to work on teams. The assumption is individual healthcare professionals will be able to work on teams after they graduate-but this does not necessarily happen. Newhouse and Mills (2002, pp. 64-69) identified key points related to nurse-physician relationships that continue to be important today in the development of effective interprofessional teams:
Though today there is increased emphasis on interprofessional teams, nurses are also members of nursing teams. For both types of teams, team functioning is the same-the same teamwork principles apply. A study examined whether there was a relationship between nursing teamwork and the application of nurse-sensitive outcomes (for example, adverse outcomes related to pressure ulcers, falls, and catheter-associated urinary tract infections). The results indicated there is a significant relationship. Improving teamwork can have a positive impact on reducing the occurrence of these preventable adverse outcomes (Rahn, 2016). Nurses need to understand this to develop effective nursing education (content and clinical experiences), leadership, and practice solutions to reduce adverse patient outcomes and include teamwork. This is a critical part of QI. Another factor that is important to consider with any type of team (nursing or interprofessional) is changing team membership, which is something healthcare teams frequently experience. Leaders need to monitor this factor and its impact on team functioning. Lack of long-term team membership may be a problem as well as increasing the need for team orientation, which is not often a routine requirement. If a nurse leader can improve teamwork, this may have a direct impact on performance, improving care, and on team/staff satisfaction.
Improving the Work Environment
Nurses need to engage in leading HCOs to improve the work environment-by identifying concerns, helping to identify supporting data and analyzing data, understanding retention of staff, assisting in the development of strategies to resolve problems, and tracking outcomes to improve the work environment and level of care. It has been noted that staff are using workarounds more, which increase the risk of errors in a work environment. A workaround is an effort to get something done without following the expected process, standards, policy, or procedure, which impacts QI as discussed in earlier content. This situation means staff do not recognize or understand a potential risk for error so that it is difficult to correct and improve. In efforts to improve and develop an effective, healthy work environment, nurse leaders need to consider the recommended competencies and critical elements in the work culture.
The March 2014 issue of Charting Nursing's Future, a newsletter that was created following the publication of The Future of Nursing report (IOM, 2011), described an emerging blueprint to transform the nurses' work environment, recommending providers, policymakers, and educators use the following strategies:
These strategies relate directly to the healthcare professions' core competencies discussed throughout this text and are still relevant.
Finding the Right Workplace for You
The process of finding the right work environment begins early for nursing students. Students begin to assess each clinical setting they are in, consciously or unconsciously, from the perspective of working in that environment. Questions that students may ask themselves include the following: Would I want to work here? In doing so, students also begin to integrate their ideas about nursing, What is a nurse? and Is this profession right for me? Socialization into the profession begins at this stage. By the time senior year arrives, students are actively considering postgraduation positions. Along with a review of Appendix Bto gain a better understanding of staffing, which is a critical issue when assessing new positions, a review of Appendix Cprovides tips related to finding the right workplace.
Stop and Consider 7 |
---|
You need to be involved in improving the healthcare work environment. |
Quality Improvement and Nursing Leadership
There is no question that all nurses need to be more active in continuous quality improvement (CQI). The AONL supports nursing leadership in HCOs and describes key principles that need to be considered to guide the role of the nurse in future patient care delivery, including CQI. The AACN's new edition of its accrediting standards includes quality and safety in its standards, as did its previous standards (AACN, 2021). Nurse managers and administrators need to be leaders in the HCO in setting CQI direction and determining strategies to improve care at all levels in the HCO and engage nursing staff in the process. Some nurses should serve in key healthcare organization QI positions. How do nurses view putting their patients' health and safety before their own? ANA's project Healthy Nurses, Healthy Nation notes that in a survey 69% of U.S. nurses said they agreed or strongly agreed with putting patient health and safety before their own (ANA, 2023b). We have seen with COVID-19 that many nurses did this during a time of extreme crisis in the workplace and in nurses' personal lives. Nurses should be active in health policy development at the local, state, and federal levels, assuming many leadership roles in this process, as policies have an impact on QI. Nursing faculty provide CQI leadership by ensuring that students, both undergraduate and graduate, are prepared to practice and remain safe, understand and know how to apply information about CQI, utilize EBP and EBM, and engage in CQI during clinical experiences (AACN, 2021). The NLN notes in its 2021-2022 public policy agenda that to make a difference, you have to make your voice heard (NLN, 2023), and this requires an understanding of the health policy process. The following sections highlight some examples of new initiatives that relate to CQI and nursing leadership.
It is important that nurses assume active roles in determining the quality of care and the role of the nurse in the process, but this was not easy to accomplish. We need to know more about effective nursing services. An important example of nursing leadership supporting quality care is the Magnet Recognition Program® (ANA, ANCC, 2023a). The Magnet program offers a nursing professional practice model to guide leadership and CQI. HCOs that apply and receive magnet status have the highest credential for nursing excellence and the leading source of successful nursing practices and strategies worldwide (Robert & Finlayson, 2015, p. 8). How was this program developed and then applied? What has been its impact?
In 1981, researchers conducted a study that explored the issue of attracting and retaining nurses (McClure et al., 1983). This study played a significant role in attempts to address the nursing shortage at that time because it identified some methods for improving recruitment and retention of nurses. The researchers sought to identify factors or variables that had an impact on acute care hospital staff recruitment and retention success. Stimulated by these results, though the initial goal was not related to developing a special program, it led to the development of the Magnet Recognition Program®. The program was established in 1993 and administered by the ANCC's Commission on the Magnet Recognition Program® (ANA, ANCC, 2023a, 2023b). This recognition is awarded to acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities. The program established a roadmap to achieve nursing excellence using the five model components and sources of evidence to drive organizational performance focused on improving the quality of patient care while lowering costs (Robert & Finlayson, 2015, p. 12). The recognition program continues to operate and focus on the five Magnet model components: (1) empirical outcomes, (2) transformational leadership, (3) new knowledge, (4) innovation and improvements, and (5) exemplary professional practice and structured empowerment (ANCC, 2023a). The model and its components support the five healthcare professions' core competencies, the QSEN competencies, and national initiatives to improve care, such as the Quality Chasm reports, including The Future of Nursing reports, Healthy People 2030, and HHS quality improvement efforts. The ANA provides resources for HCOs to use in implementing Magnet requirements (2023c).
As a result of the research that was done to develop the Magnet program, 14 Forces of Magnetism were identified. These forces relate to the five components of the model mentioned earlier and are used to evaluate an HCO and determine whether it can be designated as a Magnet HCO. The Magnet Program is not prescriptive and encourages its recognized HCOs to be innovative if the expected Magnet criteria are met. The Forces of Magnetism represent the organizational elements of excellence in nursing care (ANA, ANCC, 2023a):
It is not an easy process to be awarded Magnet status. It requires commitment and time from HCO leadership, nursing leadership, and staff. Any size HCO that meets the standards may apply for Magnet status. Accreditation is a voluntary process used to validate that an organization and an approval body meet established continuing education standards. Recognition is a process used to evaluate an organization's adherence to excellence-focused standards (Urden & Monarch, 2002, pp. 102-103). The Magnet program is a recognition program, not an accreditation program. Magnet HCOs must also successfully receive and maintain accreditation from The Joint Commission.
The first step for an HCO that wants to apply for Magnet status recognition is to complete a self-assessment using materials provided by the program. The HCO then has a better idea about where it stands and what needs to be improved before completing the application to achieve recognition. The recognition process does not focus solely on management; staff nurses must be involved in all steps of the process. After extensive sharing of information, an onsite survey is completed by the Magnet surveyors. Once recognition is obtained-and not all HCOs that apply receive Magnet status-the HCO must maintain the expected standards, participate in the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) (Press Ganey, 2023), and provide annual monitoring reports to ensure that the Magnet requirements continue to be met over time. Studies indicate that achieving recognition has a positive impact on these HCOs, such as improving professional practice, clinical competence, and job experience-all of which influence staff retention rates (Drenkard, 2022; White, 2018; Friese et al., 2015; McHugh et al., 2013; Aiken et al., 2008). Recognition is not permanent, however, and the HCO must apply for renewal. A website is maintained with current information about the Magnet program (ANA, ANCC, 2023a).
A hospital that has Magnet status also demonstrates participative management in which staff members have input into decisions, with managers listening to staff, and typically uses a decentralized structure, such as nursing professional governance. This difference in management compared to many other HCOs is evident in the role of the nurse executive and throughout all levels of nursing management, as well as in the overall organization leadership's support of nursing. Effective leadership is important in these HCOs. Staff members feel their nursing leaders understand their needs and provide resources and support for the work that staff perform daily-that is, the managers demonstrate transformational leadership. Nurses are also very active in committees, projects, and so on. EBP is also actively pursued, and the hospitals are involved in nursing research. Staffing is of critical concern, and Magnet hospitals use innovative methods to respond to recruitment and retention issues and provide appropriate staffing mix and levels per shift. Staff education is valued: There are opportunities for quality staff development supporting career-long education, and staff members who want to pursue additional academic degrees are encouraged to do so (AACN, 2021). Promotion can occur through the management track, which is the most common method, but it also should occur through the clinical track. These HCOs typically demonstrate higher levels of quality of care, autonomy, a nursing model, mentoring, professional recognition, staff education and support for career development, such as completing a baccalaureate degree or a graduate degree, and respect for staff. They enable staff to practice professional nursing as it should be practiced.
Nurses considering new positions, even if not considering a Magnet hospital, might also use these variables or the forces to guide their job search. They can assist nurses in learning more about the HCO and assessing whether the HCO has a positive workplace. If the HCO already has Magnet status, the forces should be present, but if not, the nurse applicant might assess and use the forces as a personal assessment checklist of an HCO. An integrative review study examined 29 studies and concluded Magnet status enhanced the organizational culture for nurses and also empowered nurses (Anderson et al., 2018). As data changes, additional comments about benefits are described by the ANCC (ANA, ANCC, 2023b).
Stop and Consider 8 |
---|
Many initiatives address nursing and nurse leadership emphasizing the need to engage in all aspects of healthcare delivery. |
Moving the Profession Forward: Students Are the Future of Nursing
In conclusion to this summary chapter and the text, we turn back to the nursing report, The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health (IOM, 2011), and assess the status of its recommendations. It is also important to emphasize that nursing leadership and the development of leadership do not just apply to nurses but also to nursing students.
The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health
The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health is a landmark report that addresses the need for nursing leadership. By virtue of its numbers and adaptive capacity, the nursing profession has the potential to effect wide-ranging changes in the healthcare system. Nurses' regular, close proximity to patients and scientific understanding of care processes across the continuum of care give them a unique ability to act as partners with other health professionals and to lead in the improvement and redesign of the health care system and its many practice environments (IOM, 2011, p. S-3). The Future of Nursing report focused on three nursing areas that need transformation: practice, education, and leadership. The report supported the use of transformational leadership, with its emphasis on collaborative management and other leadership competencies discussed throughout this text. In particular, it supported interprofessional collaboration and quality improvement by noting that it was important for nurses to be full partners in a health team in which members from various professions hold each other accountable for improving quality and decreasing preventable adverse events and medication errors (IOM, 2011, pp. 5-4). All nurses, regardless of the type of position they hold, need to demonstrate leadership.
Supporting an expansion of the need for nursing leadership, in 2014, Sigma Theta Tau International (STTI) joined a global effort to improve nursing leadership. It formed the Global Advisory Panel on the Future of Nursing (GAPFON), whose purpose is to serve as a catalyst to stimulate partnerships and collaborations to advance global health outcomes (STTI, 2019). This initiative is directly related to the STTI theme, Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally (STTI, 2019). The focus is on global nursing leadership, an important leadership perspective for the profession, and the experience of the global pandemic has made this even more important.
As more examination and publications about nursing and its roles and responsibilities were completed, there was greater interest in assessing where the profession was headed. Susan Hassmiller, a nursing advisor to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), described her vision for a 21st-century nursing workforce. The vision included the following interconnected processes, which are related to The Future of Nursing report recommendations (Hassmiller, 2011):
These are critical points that continue to be a guide for improving nursing leadership and engaging nurses in the healthcare delivery process. Furthermore, they also apply to nursing leadership in healthcare policy development and implementation to improve health and health care. Nursing students in all types of nursing programs need to aspire to improve their own leadership. Hassmiller and Wakefield (2022), nursing experts, commented on the report that followed the 201l report, The Future of Nursing 2020-2030, Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity (NAM, 2021). Nursing has a well-recognized place in mitigating health problems across a wide array of settings. Over the next decade, the report calls on nurses to more substantively and comprehensively commit to preventing these health problems in the first place by working tenaciously and collaboratively to eliminate the upstream factors that drive health disparities, poor health outcomes and stand in the way of achieving health equity. The report charts a path for all nurses to meaningfully pivot to advancing health equity. With the health status of individuals, families and communities at stake, the clock is running (2021, p. S9).
Progress Report on The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health
Just as it is important to evaluate health care, it is also important to evaluate the nursing profession outcomes. For example, examining what has been accomplished after implementing the recommendations found in the 2010 nursing report, The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing health (NAM 2016; Pittman et al., 2015). How did this information improve nursing and healthcare quality? From 2011 to 2016, throughout the healthcare system there was greater emphasis on CQI, for example, the establishment of the National Quality Strategy, which was mandated by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and supporting greater nursing engagement in quality improvement (Kennedy, Murphy, & Roberts, 2013). The Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action, which is a partnership with the RWJF and AARP, was established to support the quality improvement recommendations and provide a source of information and resources to assist the nursing profession in implementing strategies to meet the 2011 nursing report recommendations (Campaign for Action, 2023). Its website provides a dashboard to track the status of the recommendations. This is an important source of current information about the profession.
The following content summarizes some of the key issues related to The Future of Nursing recommendations and outcomes. As discussed in many chapters in this text, since 1999 and the publication of the first Quality Chasm reports, we have moved to a greater concern about quality, diversity and disparities, teams and interprofessional teamwork, cost, collaboration, care coordination, patient/person-centered care, and integration of the Triple Aim (better care, healthy people/healthy communities, affordable care). The recommendations are noted in bold with commentary added and relevance to CQI described below (Finkelman, 2022, pp. 459-463; IOM, 2010):
The progress report concluded with: Continued work is needed to remove scope-of-practice barriers; pathways to higher emphasis on increasing diversity; avenues for continuing competence need to be strengthened; and data on a wide range of outcomes are needed-from the education and makeup of the workforce to the services nurses provide and ways in which they lead. A major and overarching need is for the nursing community, including the Campaign, to build and strengthen coalitions with stakeholders outside of nursing. Nurses need to practice collaboratively; continue to develop skills and competencies in leadership and innovation; and work with other professionals, as no one profession alone can meet the complex needs of the future of health care (NAM, 2016, p. 16). Progress has been made, but not enough, and thus, it is important to continue monitoring, for example, by using the Campaign Dashboard, which provides nurses with ongoing updated information on the profession.
If we are to develop nursing leadership and be more engaged, then we need to get involved in all aspects of healthcare change. As an example of change described by the National Academy of Medicine in a recent article about its initiative Vital Directions for Health and Health Care, the future will be one of interaction: policy and practice in the nation's health, healthcare, and biomedical science communities (Dzau et al., 2017). The initiative's goals are highlighted in content throughout this text. Summary of comments in The Future of Nursing 2020-2030, Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity, another critical nursing report that builds on the earlier nursing reports and expands the increasing emphasis in on equity and diversity includes the following (NAM, 2021):
Demonstrating the importance of nursing and global health, the World Health Organization declared 2020 the Year of the Nurse and Nurse Midwife. At the time this was announced, we had no idea about what was to come in 2020 and beyond-the COVID-19 pandemic and its global impact. As has been discussed in this text, this has been a major public health crisis for healthcare delivery, health equity, economics, education, societies, and so much more. The December 2020 Journal of Nursing Education editorial noted that the journal was requesting manuscripts to address the following issues looking for innovations and what we have learned from this experience of coping and changes (Barton, 2020, pp. 663-664):
These are all important issues and changes will occur-either continuation of changes made to adapt to new needs that may flow from these experiences from what we have learned and their relationship to the future of nursing or new challenges that we need to address.
Student Leadership
Students need to begin developing their leadership skills while in their nursing educational program. This can be done by participation in student organizations, such as the National Student Nurses Association (NSNA), meeting requirements to be a member of STTI, or assuming leadership roles in courses and in other on-campus and off-campus activities. Developing leadership takes time, and every nurse needs leadership competencies to practice in today's complex healthcare system. Leadership development does not necessarily have to be done only in a nursing context-your involvement in campus activities and other organizations are all opportunities to develop leadership and learn more about yourself, communication, teamwork, handling conflict, and so on.
Moving forward implies change. Many people do not like change or do not feel comfortable with it. During an interview, the nurse leader Porter-O'Grady stated, Our work isn't changing. Change is our work. If you looked at change like that, it wouldn't be an enemy (Saver, 2006, p. 24). Patton, another nurse leader who served as president of the American Nurses Association (ANA), advised: See opportunities instead of challenges (Saver, 2006, p. 24). Nurses entering the profession have before them a healthcare delivery system in need of repair, as has been noted by many experts and reports. This challenge can be seen as an impossible task or as an opportunity for nurses to step up and assume new roles and expand old roles if need be. Reforming the U.S. healthcare delivery system requires that nurses are educated, competent in required competencies, provide quality nursing care, able to communicate and collaborate effectively with others, use political skills, and advocate for patients, families, communities, and the nursing profession. Nurses need to apply EBP and EBM in their decision-making, whether they are in clinical practice, management, or education. It is important for nurses to understand the possibilities that come with technology and participate in determining how technology can be used and then use it effectively. Change should be based on data and analysis of data-for example, from nursing research. Data are also associated with CQI. This is another area in which nurses need to step up and participate so that they are among the healthcare professionals who drive QI, thereby influencing how health care is provided. Last, but not least, nurses of the future need to recognize that money drives most decisions. Understanding how budgets work and how to communicate the value of nurses and nursing care are important nursing responsibilities.
This text's content is an introduction to nursing as a profession, to the healthcare system, and, most importantly, to patients, their families, and communities. Nursing is a dynamic profession in which nurses can participate in many different nursing positions throughout a nursing career. Some positions require additional education; others do not. As described in this chapter, nurses practice in many different settings. The future holds more change that will lead to new possibilities. You will have the responsibility as a nurse to participate actively in the profession to advocate for your patients (individuals, families, populations, communities) and demonstrate leadership in your practice.
Stop and Consider 9 |
---|
As a nursing student, you need to begin developing leadership competencies now. |
Discussion
Connect to EBP Information
Boamah, S., Laschinger, H., Wong, C., & Clarke, S. (2018). Effect of transformational leadership on job satisfaction and patient safety outcomes. Nursing Outlook, 66(2), 180-189.
Questions
Develop your vision of the future of nursing. How does it compare with the real world? Save this vision and review it every 6 months while in school to see if your vision changes, and then review it again after graduation as you enter nursing practice. You may find your vision of the future of nursing changes.
The AONL is conducting a nursing leadership COVID-19 study. This is a large study and an important one to further understand current healthcare delivery and nursing during a critical crisis. This provides an example of the importance of nursing leadership and how nursing organizations get involved in national and state healthcare delivery problems and policies. In your student discussion team, examine this initiative. Review the study design and its status at https://www.aonl.org/resources/nursing-leadership-covid-19-survey
Case 1
The CNL functions as a care coordinator either at the unit level or in a practice. For example, Ms. Apple heads up a busy practice in a cancer institute. As a CNL, she acts as a mentor to novice nurses while coordinating care and helping patients navigate the healthcare maze.
In one patient's case, Ms. Apple identified the need for transportation to and from radiation appointments. She also recognized the importance of financial counseling because the patient was no longer able to work, and her husband was on disability. Treatment plans needed to be explained, and teaching the patient about medications was necessary. A referral had been made to a radiation interventionist. The family needed knowledge about the problems and an explanation of all aspects of care. The CNL called a meeting of the interprofessional team to ensure clear communication and the creation of an interprofessional plan of care.
In some institutions, these positions are called nurse navigators; in others, CNLs, depending on the organization's structure and needs. The CNL with expertise in interprofessional communication, reimbursement, and human relations serves the patient and family to protect and ensure quality patient-focused care and promote safety. (Find out more about nurse navigators by searching online.)
Case 1 Questions
Case 2
You have taken a new position as a head nurse for a 30-bed surgical unit. You have been working in the hospital for 7 years-for the first 4 years as a staff nurse and in the last 3 years as the assistant nurse manager on a surgical unit. However, the new position means you need to change units. The CNO arranged for you to have a mentor, as another nurse manager, to help you as you transition to the new role and new unit. Before you meet with your mentor for the first time as a mentee, consider the following questions.
Case 2 Questions