section name header

Symptoms

Variable onset of central visual loss, central or paracentral scotoma, metamorphopsia, photopsias in the central visual field.

Signs

(See Figures 11.17.1 and 11.17.2.)

Figure 11.17.1: Exudative AMD.

Rapuano9781975243722-ch011_f033.jpg

Figure 11.17.2: Intravenous fluorescein angiography of exudative AMD.

Rapuano9781975243722-ch011_f034.jpg

Critical

Drusen and SRF, ME or RPE detachment associated with CNV.

Other

Risk Factors for Loss of Vision

Advanced age, hyperopia, light-colored iris, family history, soft (large) drusen, focal subretinal pigment clumping, RPE detachments, systemic HTN, and smoking. Note that patients with wet AMD in one eye have a 10% to 12% risk per year of developing CNV in the fellow eye. The risk increases for eyes with multiple or confluent soft drusen with RPE clumping.

Differential Diagnosis

Types of Neovascular AMD Lesions

Workup

  1. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy with a handheld lens to detect CNV and associated exudation.

  2. Perform IVFA or OCTA if CNV is suspected. IVFA is useful to confirm neovascular AMD size, type, and location. OCTA is useful as a noninvasive alternative to IVFA or when IVFA is inconclusive such as in pattern dystrophy or central CSCR. OCTA is also useful if there is an allergy to fluorescein dye or in pregnancy when it is best to avoid dye use.

  3. OCT is helpful in determining retinal thickness, presence of CNV, CNV thickness, location, and extent of ME, SRF, fibrosis, and RPE detachment. OCT is the primary modality for following response to treatment. OCT will also help to detect and follow any concomitant GA which may or may not also affect vision.

  4. ICGA may help delineate the borders of certain obscured occult CNV, particularly with subretinal blood or exudation. It also shows RAP and IPCV lesions better than IVFA.

Treatment

Follow-Up

Depends on the treatment algorithm used, but typically monthly follow-up until the CNV lesion is inactive with resolution of exudative signs based on examination and OCT. Patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy need indefinite follow-up, though the follow-up frequency depends on treatment response and treatment algorithm, for example, PRN versus TAE. Patients receiving intravitreal injections should be given warning symptoms for endophthalmitis and RD.

References

DugelPU, KohA, OguraY, et al; HAWK and HARRIER Study Investigators. HAWK and HARRIER: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked trials of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(1):7284.

HeierJS, BrownDM, ChongV. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:25372548.

KhananiAM, KotechaA, ChangA, et al; TENAYA and LUCERNE Investigators. TENAYA and LUCERNE: Two-year results from the phase 3 neovascular age-related macular degeneration trials of faricimab with treat-and-extend dosing in year 2. Ophthalmology. 2024:131(8):914926.

LanzettaP, KorobelnikJF, HeierJS, et al; PULSAR Investigators. Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (PULSAR): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024:403(10432):11411152.

RosenfeldPJ, BrownDM, HeierJS, et al; MARINA Study Group. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:14191431.

The CATT Research Group. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:18971908.